1/25/2024 0 Comments Tortoisehg vs tortoisesvn![]() GIT is really great on OS systems like Unix, BSD, Linux, Solaris and their derivatives. For that reason, GIT gives individuals better local version control. SVN is designed to be more central where GIT is based on each user having their own GIT repo and those repos push changes back up into a central one. Git is a decentralized to a point where people can track their own edits locally without having to push things to an external server. If you had older versions intalled, you want to remove them first.In short: SVN is one repo and lots of clients, while GIT is a repo with lots of client repos, each with a user. To configure APT to trust this repository's signing key, run: sudo apt-key adv -keyserver -recv-key 323293EE IMPORTANT: As current TortoiseHg versions often require a newer version of Mercurial itself than Ubuntu itself supplies, you will also need to add this PPA. How to add the ppa repository on linux (replace oneiric by your version):Īdd the following entries to package manager: deb oneiric main I really just wanted to add a comment to suggestions about TortoiseHG, but the comments are closed, Certainly, the Hg command set looks a lot friendlier than the Git command set, in my opinion, and it tends to play well with older SVN repositories. Most of the reasoning had to do with speed, flexibility and ease of use. That said, Google has chosen to go with Mercurial (Hg) as their distributed version control on Google Code. Distributed version control tends to be a lot more useful in larger projects with lots of branching and merging going on, as distributed VCS tend to value high quality merging over everything else. This is especially true if you're already running a function SVN server. Mercurial is not designed for this purpose and I don't think, Bazaar or Git would be more fun on this.Ĭonsidering your setup, it seems somewhat unnecessary to employ distributed version control when you're only working with a few local computers. Any French accents or German umlauts will spoil your work when switching between any OS using UTF-8 and the other one.Ģ) You should not use a lot of large binary files. Neither Mercurial, nor Bazaar or Git does encoding conversion like Subversion (see CharacterEncodingOnWindows). Plus: With clone+push+pull you also have an integrated, fast and intelligent backup.īut, there are also some disadvantages to consider:ġ) If you share your work between Windows and any *nix system, you should only use ASCII characters for file names. It tends to be more fun, no matter if you do the lone hacker scenario or work in a huge team. Sorry, but I don't know about installation on Mac.ĭVCS tends to be useful anyway. So update your APT sources list, import the keys and you can install TortoiseHg with a very nice integration to Gnome. ![]() I know, there are PPA-repositories for Ubuntu and maybe for Debian, also. ![]() "sudo apt-get install mercurial" is all you need (on a Debian based system) to use command line Mercurial, but this version might not be the most recent one. It's nothing more than this single package. Now you do have the current version of command line Mercurial and the SVN convert tool, too. Installation is really easy: Download and install TortoiseHg and just one reboot. No more broken histories, because you have used your favourite renaming tool instead of 'svn move'. Afterwards choose the "Guess renames" feature in the context menu and have fun. And it still improves very fast (I used it since version 0.4, current is 0.9.2 with Mercurial 1.4.2).Ī nice feature for example: Just do a lot of refactoring in your IDE and don't care about renaming. If your familiar with TortoiseSVN you can use it straight away.Īs of today, TortoiseHg is better than TortoiseSVN in my opinion. You can even work with Git repositories using the hg-git extension for Mercurial, as CAD bloke mentions. Mercurial's Subversion import is also fantastic. There are a few quirks in the interface, but overall it's very solid (and if you use the revision graph view it looks great). It also installs the hg command-line system, so you can drop down into that if you need to (or if you prefer doing version control on the command line). I've personally had good experiences with TortoiseHg. And if you're used to using TortoiseSVN, the transition to Git should be pretty smooth, as TortoiseGit is based upon the TortoiseSVN code base and reuses a lot of it's UI and design principles. Of the three that you mentioned, Git certainly has the most polished "Tortoise", in my opinion. Whilst it's true that git's performance suffers on windows, it's going to be perfectly acceptable in most situations.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |